On May 1st, 2017 California Senators Bob Wieckowski and Kevin De León announced a new bill (SB775) on carbon pricing in California that CalFACT is supporting.
CalFACT Talking points on SB775
Take Action: Call or write your legislators today!
What we like about the bill:
- A steadily rising price – the bill would modify California’s cap and trade system to have a steadily rising price starting in 2021 which would allow consumers, businesses, and investors the predictability they need to accelerate the shift to a clean energy future in California.
- Protecting low and middle income households – the bill includes returning some revenue from the program directly to households, which will protect households from the effects of price increases while still motivating emissions reductions. This can allow the price to rise to the level necessary to reach our climate goals, while protecting families and communities, stimulating our economy, and encouraging ongoing public support for the state’s climate programs.
- Simplicity – the bill would eliminate offsets and allocation of free allowances as well as minimizing banking of allowances from year to year.
- Improved air quality in disadvantaged and fenceline communities – the elimination of offsets and free allowances should motivate greater emissions reductions at all sites state wide and reduce the chances of toxic “hotspots” in low income neighborhoods.
- Wider coverage of emissions – With no free allowances and 100% of the emission allowances auctioned, a greater part of the economy would be covered by the carbon price.
- Protecting the California economy and jobs – the bill provides for a border adjustment to provide a level playing field between California and states and countries without a similar carbon price, thus discouraging the movement of emissions (and jobs) outside of California.
- Greater emissions reductions – with the price rising steadily to a level higher than under existing statute we can expect a greater reduction in emissions from the carbon price.
Questions we have
- Funding for existing and additional climate programs – will this bill provide funding for programs currently funded by cap and trade through the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund? How much additional funding will it provide for climate related programs?
- Support from the Environmental Justice community – will this bill work for the environmental justice community and gain their support? How will it relate to other bills in process such as AB378?
- Will the border adjustment survive legal challenges? – a state level border adjustment is a new innovation in state carbon pricing and we look forward to seeing the details of how this can be implemented within the bounds of the commerce clause.
More info
The bill will leave the existing cap and trade system in place through 2020, and then modify it beyond that to have a steadily rising floor price for emissions allowances starting at $20 in 2021 and increasing $5/year starting in 2022 plus inflation.It will also have a steadily rising price ceiling starting at $30/year in 2021 and rising at $10/year plus inflation. The program will set an steadily declining annual limit of emissions and auction those allowances at a price between the floor and ceiling price (with no free allocation of allowances). If the prices rises to the ceiling, an unlimited number of additional allowances will be offered at that price.
- Official SB775 Fact Sheet from Senator Bob Wieckowski (6/29/2017 version)
- CalFACT presentation to Citizens’ Climate Lobby Volunteers May 8, 2017
- CalFACT Talking Points on SB775
Endorsements and Support
- Citizens’ Climate Lobby
- California Environmental Justice Alliance, Asian Pacific Environmental Network, Center for Race Poverty and the Environment, and Leadership Council for Justice and Accountability – Senate Introduces Bold Vision for Equitable Carbon Pricing Policy
- California Climate Equity Coalition Statement on SB 775 – Coalition for Clean Air, Public Advocates, Asian Pacific Environmental Network, SCOPE, Greenlining Institute
- Coalition for Clean Air
- Friends of the Earth
- Union of Concerned Scientists
- Sierra Club California (support in concept)
- City of Santa Monica
- Dr. Barbara Haya, UC Berkeley Energy & Climate Institute
- Dr. Mark Paul, Samuel DuBois Cook Center on Social Equity, Duke University
- Dr. Anders Fremstad, Department of Economics, Colorado State University
- Interfaith Climate Action Network of Contra Costa County
- Center for Climate Protection
- Physicians for Social Responsibility – SF
- Sonoma County Regional Climate Protection Authority
- Western Center for Law & Poverty
- Sunflower Alliance
- 350 Bay Area
- Fossil Free California
- SoCal 350
- City of Cloverdale
- Contra Costa Interfaith Climate Action
- Courage Campaign
- Insight Center for Community Economic Development
- Lamorinda Peace & Justice Group
- San Diego350
- Universal Income Project
News Coverage
- Senator Wieckowski Press Release (6/30/2017) – More groups line up in support for Senate Cap and Trade bill
- Benicia Herald (6/26/2017) – Support clean energy legislation
- LA Times (6/23/2017) – California’s climate debate heats up behind closed doors as Gov. Brown pushes to extend cap and trade
- Sacramento Bee (6/22/2017) – Gov. Brown prepares for a new climate battle, and it probably will cost you
- Capital and Main (6/21/2017) – Will California Overhaul Its Cap-and-Trade Program?
- The Guardian (6/20/2017) – Climate goals: inside California’s effort to overhaul its ambitious emissions plan
- National Caucus of Environmental Legislators (6/16/2017) – Ambitious New Cap-And-Trade Bill Proposed in California
- Santa Maria Sun (6/14/2017) – An idea whose time has come
- Sacramento Bee (6/13/2017) – Jerry Brown uses pomp and symbolism to win GOP votes for climate bill. Will it work?
- Argus (6/9/2017) – Path for California cap-and-trade extension unclear
- American Shipper (6/13/2017) – Clean transport companies call for California cap-and-trade program extension
- Ag Alert (6/14/2017) – Cap and trade: With program in limbo, farmers look at impacts
- Santa Rosa Press Democrat (6/8/2017) – State can show the way on climate policy
- Modesto Bee (6/4/2017) – Want jobs for the ‘forgotten man’? Finish high-speed rail
- StateScoop (6/5/2017) – Snubbing Trump’s Paris climate accord withdrawal, California proposes to price out polluters
- Vallejo Times-Hearld (6/2/2017) – Time for California to step up on climate and Benicia Herlad
- Greenling Blog (6/1/2017) – Cap-and-Trade, Clean Energy, and Protecting Communities of Color
- SF Chronicle (/6/3/2017) – Letters to the Editor – Cap and Trade Program
- MIT Technology Review (6/1/2017) – Amid Trump Cuts, California Proposes Its Own Energy Moonshot
- LA Times (5/26/2017) – A delay on cap-and-trade vote would be a victory for Donald Trump, Gov. Jerry Brown’s office says
- Recordnet (5/25/2017) – Letter: Senate bill needs approval
- KQED – (5/25/2017) – State Democrats Have New Leverage in Effort to Curb Greenhouse Gases
- Energy Institute at Haas (5/22/2017) – California’s Carbon Border Wall
- Planning Report (5/21/2017) – State Senator Wieckowski Offers Alternative to Post-2020 Cap and Trade
- LA Times (5/18/2017) – A new question on California’s cap-and-trade program — how many votes are needed to keep it going?
- Legal Planet (5/18/2017) – The Way Forward on Cap-and-Trade
- Legal Planet (5/15/2017) – Understanding SB 775: A Realistic Path to Achieving California’s Climate Goals
- Legal Planet (5/12/2017) – Equity at the Center: SB 775 and AB 378 Create New Path Towards More Equitable, Effective Climate Policy
- LA Times (5/11/2017) – California set an ambitious goal for fighting global warming. Now comes the hard part
- KQED (5/11/2017) – Legislators Consider Changes to California’s Cap and Trade
- LA Times (5/11/2017) – Here’s how California could change its cap-and-trade program for climate change
- McClatchy DC Bureau (5/10/2017) – California climate change debate heats up
- Sen Wieckowski Press Release (5/10/2017) – Cap and Trade oversight hearing highlights need for SB 775
- Legislative Analysts Office (5/10/2017) – Cap and Trade Report
- Senate Environmental Quality Committee Hearing (5/10/2017) – Video Agenda Background Information
- Legal Planet (5/10/2017) – Three Revisions Not to Overlook in California’s New Cap-and-Trade Proposal, SB 775
- Sacramento Bee (5/9/2017) – California’s climate-change advances could be jeopardized by ill-conceived Senate bill
- Legal Planet (5/9/2017) – “California Alone” Should Not Govern State Climate Policy
- Lexology (5/8/32017) – California Dreaming: The Golden State Considers Overhauling its Cap & Trade System
- Huffington Post (/5/7/2017) – Ten Years of California Climate Dividends Advocacy Leading to SB775
- SF Business Times (5/5/2017) – The Bay Area winners and losers of the state’s proposed cap-and-trade overhaul
- Desert Sun (5/5/2017) – Republicans in California say they’re ready to work on climate change. Should Democrats take them seriously?
- Basic Income News (5/5/2017) – US: California State Legislature to Consider Carbon Dividend
- TVO (5/5/2017) – Ontario may be forced into better policy, despite itself
- Carbon Pulse (5/4/2017) – Compromise reached on Assembly bills to extend California cap-and-trade
- CTV News (5/3/2017) – California tables new cap-and-trade plan that jumps ahead of Quebec and Ontario
- Vox (5/3/2017) – California is about to revolutionize climate policy … again
- Scramento Bee (5/2/2017) – Bill would return California carbon-fee money to consumers
- CBS SF (5/2/2017) – California May Return Carbon Fee Money To Consumers
- San Jose Mercury News (5/1/2017) – Bay Area senator would return California carbon-fee money to consumers
- E&E Climate Wire (5/1/2017) – Senate leader proposes big changes to carbon-pricing program
- Capitol Public Radio (5/2/2017) – California Senate Proposes Overhaul of Cap-And-Trade Program
- Washington Post (5/2/2017) – As Trump reverses climate actions, California considers a bold new step
- US News (5/1/2017) – Bill Would Return California Carbon-Fee Money to Consumers
- MIT Technology Review (5/1/2017) – California proposes ambitious new cap and trade program
- Sacramento Bee (5/1/2017) – California Senate proposes cap-and-trade overhaul: price limits in, free credits out
- LA Times (5/1/2017) – Companies would face tighter environmental restrictions in California under new cap-and-trade proposal
- SF Chronicle (5/1/2017) – New bill would help California combat climate change
- Carbon Pulse (5/1/20170) – California Senate weighs in on cap-and-trade reauthorization debate with its own controversial bill